THE TIMBER THAT DISAPPEARED
- Special Correspodent
- Jan 26
- 3 min read
How 69% of Shadeland Monastery's $651,000 Timber Windfall
Went to the Bishop's House
Remember that $450,114 transfer from Shadeland Monastery we told you to remember?
Here's what they didn't tell you.
The Monastery's Miracle: A $651,000 Windfall
In 2017, Shadeland Monastery received an extraordinary gift from nature: a timber sale worth $651,000.
To understand how extraordinary this was, you need to see the monastery's normal finances:

Look at that carefully. The monastery's ordinary income was only $8,264 – barely enough to keep the lights on.
The $651,000 timber sale was 79 times larger than the monastery's normal annual income.
This was not regular income. This was a one-time gift from the land – timber that had grown for decades on monastery property. A gift from nature that should have secured the monastery's future for years to come.
The 69% That Vanished
But the monastery never got to use that gift to secure its future.
Here's what happened to the $651,000:

The diocese took $450,114 – nearly 70% of the timber windfall – to help purchase the New Rochelle property.
Let that sink in: A one-time gift from the monastery's land was raided to pay for the bishop's house.
What Was Left Behind
The monastery kept $200,886 from the timber sale. That sounds like a lot, right?
But here's the cruel reality:

Without the timber sale and 'other income,' the monastery was running a deficit of $146,537 on its regular operations.
So what happened to the $200,886 the monastery kept from the timber sale?
• Covered the $146,537 operating deficit
• Left approximately $54,349 for the monastery
From a $651,000 windfall, after the bishop took his share and the monastery covered its deficit, only $54,349 remained – about 8% of the original gift.
The Real Cost
This wasn't just a financial transaction. This was the theft of the monastery's future.
Consider what that $450,114 could have meant for Shadeland Monastery:
• Building repairs and maintenance for decades
• A proper endowment generating annual income
• Programs to serve the community and strengthen faith
Instead, it went to help buy a $1.95 million house for a bishop who:
• Had already lost $244,000 on the Warren property
• Was borrowing $1.5 million from Raymond James
• Had paid ~$100,000 commission to his kuma (real estate agent)
• Would systematically drain the diocesan endowment to pay for it
The monastery's one-time gift became fuel for the bishop's real estate ambitions.
The Pattern Continues
Now you can see the complete picture of 2017:

2017 was the year the systematic financial destruction began:
• Sold Warren at a loss → proceeds disappeared
• Raided Shadeland's timber windfall → 69% taken
• Took massive loan → created permanent debt
• Bought expensive house → triggered endowment draining
And now, with the endowment destroyed and the loan still outstanding, parishes with assets become the next target.
The Spiritual Betrayal
There's something particularly egregious about raiding a monastery's windfall to fund a bishop's real estate ambitions.
Monasteries exist to:
• Preserve and transmit the Orthodox faith
• Serve as centers of prayer and spiritual life
• Support the broader Church through their witness
• Provide hospitality and service to those in need
They are not:
• Real estate investment vehicles for bishop Irinej
• Piggy banks to raid when the bishop makes bad decisions
• Sources of funds to cover losses from failed property deals
When timber grows on monastery land for decades, it represents God's provision for that holy place. Taking 69% of that provision to fund a bishop's mansion isn't just bad stewardship – it's spiritual theft.
—
So now you know what that $450,114 really was:
Not a generous contribution from a prosperous monastery. Not surplus funds looking for a worthy purpose. Not diocesan savings wisely invested.
It was 69% of a one-time gift from the land, stripped from a monastery running an operating deficit, taken to help pay for a house the diocese couldn't afford.
The timber disappeared into the bishop's real estate empire.



Comments